Skip to content
TRP

Workbook sheet

Methodology

10 matching public rows · workbook v312-bcbfaf0393844f14e5d03119

References are navigational context only; they do not establish culpability or corroboration.

Row 1

Evidence
  1. Journalist Evidence Standard

Row 3

  1. Rule
  2. Operational Standard
  3. D848 Application
  4. Status
  5. Source
  6. Notes

Row 4

Evidenceeverydocument
  1. Evidence first
  2. Record what the source establishes before interpretation; separate source statements from independent facts.
  3. D848 is authoritative for what DOJ reported about its own production/review process, not proof that every underlying document or allegation is true.
  4. ACTIVE
  5. https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1426091/dl
  6. Administrative/official source, not a merits adjudication.
Official source

Row 5

  1. No guilt by association
  2. A name, relationship, contact entry, reference, professional role, or appearance in an EFTA file never creates a culpability edge by itself.
  3. D848 mentions categories of persons and later reporting obligations; no person-level culpability edges created.
  4. ACTIVE
  5. https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1426091/dl
  6. No person list harvested.
Official source

Row 6

clues
  1. Protected persons
  2. Do not propagate victim names, medical details, family clues, identifying combinations, juror identities, or reverse-identification clues.
  3. Only victim-protection categories and review procedures are stored.
  4. ACTIVE
  5. https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1426091/dl
  6. No victim identifiers copied.
Official source

Row 7

docketclaim
  1. Source-chain limits
  2. Label official, judicial, mirror, age-gated, incomplete, and duplicate access states explicitly.
  3. Official DOJ PDF complete; D848 docket mapping corroborated by later SDNY opinion; local binary acquisition failed.
  4. ACTIVE
  5. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1%3A2025cv10468/654959/10/
  6. No local PDF SHA-256 claim.
Source link

Row 8

  1. Gross vs unique denominator
  2. Do not treat the 3.5M production benchmark as a unique-page count.
  3. DOJ says over-collection and intra-DOJ sharing created duplication and the non-duplicative responsive count is significantly smaller.
  4. ACTIVE
  5. https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1426091/dl
  6. Project progress denominator remains 3.5M as a working gross-production benchmark.
Official source

Row 9

evidence
  1. Charge-evidence promotions
  2. Promote VERIFIED_EVIDENCE_USED only when a sufficiently strong source establishes trial use and count relationship.
  3. D848 is production-process reporting; zero charge-evidence promotions.
  4. ACTIVE
  5. Counts 1,3,5,6 remain continuity-qualified carry-forward states.

Row 10

evidence
  1. Jury firewall
  2. Never infer juror mental process from admission, summation, verdict, or post-trial filings.
  3. D848 has no juror-use evidence; jury reliance remains UNKNOWN.
  4. ACTIVE
  5. No juror mental-process inference.

Row 11

docket
  1. Duplicate control
  2. Count one underlying page once; alternate mirrors, republications, and docket cross-postings get no duplicate credit.
  3. D848 official PDF counted once; later judicial references and screenshots get zero additional page credit.
  4. ACTIVE
  5. https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1426091/dl
  6. Six physical pages total.
Official source