Skip to content
TRP

Workbook sheet

Claims Ledger

12 matching public rows · workbook v312-bcbfaf0393844f14e5d03119

References are navigational context only; they do not establish culpability or corroboration.

Row 1

Claims
  1. D848 Claims / Findings Ledger

Row 3

Classification
  1. ID
  2. Finding
  3. Classification
  4. What It Establishes
  5. What It Does NOT Establish
  6. Source
  7. Follow-up

Row 4

  1. 848-01
  2. DOJ reported more than 6 million pages identified as potentially responsive.
  3. DOJ OFFICIAL REPRESENTATION
  4. Scale of DOJ collection as DOJ reported it.
  5. A unique-page count, complete responsiveness determination, or independently audited total.
  6. https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1426091/dl
  7. Use as gross collection metric only.
Official source

Row 5

  1. 848-02
  2. DOJ reported over 3 million responsive pages in the Jan. 30 release plus >2,000 videos and 180,000 images; combined releases nearly 3.5 million pages.
  3. DOJ OFFICIAL REPRESENTATION
  4. DOJ-reported gross release scale.
  5. A unique-page universe; DOJ itself says duplication makes the non-duplicative count significantly smaller.
  6. https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1426091/dl
  7. Keep 3.5M only as project gross-production denominator.
Official source

Row 6

  1. 848-03
  2. DOJ said its collection drew from a sentence labeled “five primary sources” but enumerated six numbered categories.
  3. SOURCE SELF-INCONSISTENCY
  4. The letter contains an internal numeric/text discrepancy.
  5. Which phrase is the intended count; no silent correction is justified.
  6. https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1426091/dl
  7. Preserve exactly; do not normalize away.
Official source

Row 7

every
  1. 848-04
  2. DOJ described >500 first-level reviewers and 40 specialized second-level attorneys, plus SDNY/SDFL QC layers.
  3. DOJ OFFICIAL REPRESENTATION
  4. DOJ’s stated review architecture and staffing scale.
  5. That every page received identical review or that errors were eliminated.
  6. https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1426091/dl
  7. Compare with later redaction-error filings such as D851.
Official source

Row 8

  1. 848-05
  2. DOJ reported approximately 200,000 pages withheld or redacted based on privileges.
  3. DOJ OFFICIAL REPRESENTATION
  4. DOJ-reported privilege-based withholding/redaction scale.
  5. Independent legal validation of each privilege assertion or an exact unique-page count.
  6. https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1426091/dl
  7. Track later formal report/Federal Register justifications.
Official source

Row 9

  1. 848-06
  2. DOJ said no files were withheld or redacted on national-defense/foreign-policy grounds.
  3. DOJ OFFICIAL REPRESENTATION
  4. DOJ’s stated withholding basis for this production.
  5. That no responsive material implicates national security; only DOJ’s stated use of that statutory basis.
  6. https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1426091/dl
  7. No extrapolation.
Official source

Row 10

documentsdocument
  1. 848-07
  2. DOJ acknowledged duplicate/partial-duplicate documents and likely redaction inconsistencies.
  3. DOJ OFFICIAL REPRESENTATION / METHODOLOGY LIMIT
  4. Known DOJ-stated production limitation relevant to workbook deduplication and source caution.
  5. Which specific records are duplicates or inconsistently redacted.
  6. https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1426091/dl
  7. Maintain per-document duplicate gate.
Official source

Row 11

  1. 848-08
  2. DOJ said foreign-language pages and technically incompatible materials were not produced because they could not be reviewed for responsiveness.
  3. DOJ OFFICIAL REPRESENTATION / PRODUCTION LIMIT
  4. A stated completeness limitation in the public production.
  5. The contents, responsiveness, or significance of those unproduced materials.
  6. https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1426091/dl
  7. Log as known universe limitation.
Official source

Row 12

docket
  1. 848-09
  2. DOJ stated some protective/sealing-order and grand-jury materials required additional court action before release.
  3. DOJ OFFICIAL REPRESENTATION / LEGAL-PROCESS LIMIT
  4. DOJ’s described legal-process constraint.
  5. That any particular protected record was ultimately released or admissible.
  6. https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1426091/dl
  7. Cross-check later docket orders individually.
Official source

Row 13

  1. 848-10
  2. DOJ said sexually explicit material was redacted to protect female victims/possible victims and library access required age verification.
  3. DOJ OFFICIAL REPRESENTATION / PROTECTED-PERSON CONTROL
  4. Reason for age gate and redaction category as DOJ stated it.
  5. Identity, victim status, or culpability of any person depicted.
  6. https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1426091/dl
  7. Do not bypass age/privacy controls or propagate identities.
Official source